Dr. Aseem Malhotra was originally a staunch defender of COVID vaccines. In fact on February 5, 2021 he said “We need to understand where this vaccine hesitancy is coming from…The first thing is there is some clearly irrational reasoning behind why people don’t want to take the vaccine which is based on very blatant false information that is circulating on social media.” He was also among the first people in the UK to be double jabbed. 19 months later, the cardiologist had lost his dad to an unexplained heart attack, had two years of research and two peer reviewed studies in front of him when he completely changed course. On September 26, 2022 Malhotra explained “In conclusion of both papers, there is a strong scientific, ethical, and moral case to be made that the covid-19 vaccine rollout must stop immediately until raw data has been released for fully independent scrutiny.”
Dr. Malhotra was brought on “Great Britain News” to discuss his complete reversal from what he had said before. Dan Wootton asked him what he means when he now calls the vaccine push a “Pandemic of Misinformation”. Malhotra answered by saying “I think what we’re dealing with now with hindsight is perhaps the greatest miscarriage of medical science we will witness in our lifetime. And the reason I say that is we were led to believe from the beginning…we had conflated this emergency use authorization vaccine with traditional vaccines…” They discussed how he is not “anti-vax” and how this is specifically about the covid jabs, mainly the mRNA shots. They continued to discuss the need for informed consents and then moved to the efficacy of the jabs. The doctor claimed it is “extremely poor, certainly in relation to other vaccines” and “We know now that it doesn’t prevent infection. In the beginning we were led to believe it was going to prevent infection. It’s going to stop transmission. You’re going to help save granny. It didn’t take long to figure out that this was not true." The conversation continues and Malhotra said “There is some data that suggest certainly with recurrent boosters, probably an immunosuppressant effect. You really couldn’t make up that the vaccine is causing an immunosuppressant effect”. In simple terms, he said during the delta wave if you were over 80, about 230 people had to be vaccinated to prevent a covid death. Ages 70-80 saw the number rise to 520 people. With Omicron that number shot up to about 7,300 people vaccinated to prevent one death. He said “That’s not that great in terms of benefit. Now if there were no side effects at all you could say fine, let’s vaccinate as many people as possible and we’ll save some lives. The problem is this. Reanalysis of the highest quality data we have (that led to the approval of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines) published in the peer reviewed Vaccine Journal a few weeks ago…suggest a greater risk of a serious adverse event (life-changing, disability, hospitalization) then being hospitalized with covid."
He went on to say that he has separately analyzed the risk of heart problems, as he is a cardiologist. He said that he was trying to figure out why his otherwise healthy father had a heart attack and a few months later, important data started to emerge that suggested the covid mRNA vaccine increased coronary inflammation. The data showed that within two months of getting the covid vaccine, it increases your cardiovascular risk.
Among other things, Dr. Malhotra’s peer reviewed article “Curing the Pandemic of Misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Through Real Evidence-Based Medicine” showed there is a risk that 1 out of every 800 people who get vaccinated will have a serious adverse reaction which even exceeds what was found in the trials. The paper also shows a 20% increase in cardiac arrest emergency calls in 2021 compared to before the vaccine. In Israelis between the ages of 16 and 39, there is a 25% increase in acute coronary syndrome and cardiac arrests following the first two jabs. This was specifically associated with the vaccine and not with contracting covid. The doctor said it is important to make the distinction and said news reports blaming the increase in heart issues on covid are not factual. He mentioned how a lot of this is likely a result of deliberate PR machines from Big Pharma and mentioned how Big Tobacco did the same thing when trying to convince the public that smoking was safe. Watch any major news channel and you’ll see Pfizer, Moderna, and other covid vaccine maker brands all over the commercials. Pfizer alone has made 37 Billion dollars off of vaccines so far. Dr. Malhotra ended the interview by saying that even if it had an effect early on with the alpha strain of the virus, what is circulating now is no worse than the flu. He asked when we have a serious adverse reaction event rate of between 1 in 800 and 1 in 1000, why is the vaccine not being pulled? Swine Flu Vaccine in 1976 was pulled because it caused Guillain-Barré Syndrome in 1 in 100,000 people. The Rotavirus vaccine in 1999 was pulled because it caused bowel obstruction for 1 in 10,000. We’re talking 1 in 800. Other Important Information Found in Dr. Malhotra’s Study For Those Who Want More Information:
Informed Consent and How Many People Need To be Injected to Save one Life From Covid
“What should be part of the shared decision-making informed consent discussion when any member of the public is considering taking the shot is something along these lines: Depending on your age, several hundreds or thousands of people like you would need to be injected in order to prevent one person from dying from the Delta variant of COVID-19 over a period of around three months. For the over 80s, this figure is at least 230, but it rises the younger you are, reaching at least 2600 for people in their 50s, 10000 for those in their 40s, and 93 000 for those between 18 and 29years. For omicron, which has been shown to be 30% – 50% less lethal, meaning significantly more people would need to be vaccinated to prevent one death. How long any protection actually lasts for is unknown; boosters are currently being recommended after as short a period as 4 months in some countries.” Myocarditis Found in 80% of Adverse Reaction Hospitalizations
“Although vaccine-induced myocarditis is not often fatal in young adults, MRI scans reveal that, of the ones admitted to hospital, approximately 80% have some degree of myocardial damage. It is like suffering a small heart attack and sustaining some – likely permanent – heart muscle injury. It is uncertain how this will play out in the longer-term, including if, and to what degree, it will increase the risk of poor quality of life or potentially more serious heart rhythm disturbances in the future.” VAERS Info Mentioned in Study
“For example, over 24,000 deaths have now been recorded in VAERS as of 02 March 2022; 29% of these occurred within 48 hr of injection, and half within two weeks. The average reporting rate prior to 2020 was less than 300 deaths per annum.” This of course speaks to how before covid vaccines, there were never more than 300 VAERS deaths in a year reported for all other jabs combined. The study also makes a point to discuss that experts that VAERS reporting is actually only about 1%-10% of the true numbers. That means the actual death toll could be as high as 240,000 to 2.4 million deaths. No Significant Reduction in Illness for Vaccinated and Long-Term Slightly More Death Among the Vaccinated
“Contrary to popular belief, what the trial did not show was any statistically significant reduction in serious illness or COVID-19 mortality from the vaccine over the 6-month period of the trial, but the actual numbers of deaths (attributed to COVID-19) are still important to note. There were only two deaths from COVID-19 in the placebo group and one death from COVID-19 in the vaccine group. Looking at all-cause mortality over a longer period, there were actually slightly more deaths in the vaccine group (19 deaths) than in the placebo group (17 deaths). Also of note was the extremely low rate of COVID-19 illness classed as severe in the placebo group (nine severe cases out of 21,686 subjects, 0.04%), reflecting a very low risk of severe illness even in regions chosen for the trial because of perceived high prevalence of infection.” Written By Chris Turner Online Content Chair Sources: Full Interview: https://youtu.be/z5uyYSkPVng Journal of Insulin Resistance Peer Reviewed Research Paper: Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine
https://insulinresistance.org/index.php/jir/article/view/71 Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults (Peer Reviewed Vaccine Journal): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22010283#b0005 https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/360515